Which statement describes the architect's liability for the results of decisions provided in good faith?

• A. The architect is always liable for all outcomes
• B. The architect is liable for the results regardless of good faith
• C. The architect is liable only for intentional misconduct
• D. The architect is not liable for the results if provided in good faith

Answer: (D)

In this context, fault—not every unfavorable outcome—drives the architect’s liability. If the architect provides decisions in good faith and exercises the professional standard of care, those decisions are generally not the basis for liability for the project’s results. The key idea is that liability arises from professional negligence or a breach of duty, not from every decision that turns out poorly when made honestly and with reasonable diligence under the circumstances.

So, when decisions are made in good faith and within the standard of care, liability for the project’s results does not automatically attach. If, however, the architect fails to meet the standard of care or engages in negligent acts, liability can arise despite good faith. The other options imply unconditional or limited liability for either all outcomes or only intentional misconduct, which does not reflect how AIA contracts handle professional responsibility.